Recognizing and Evaluating the Ruling Dimension in Collective Housing after the Islamic Revolution in Tehran, with a Look at the Discourses that Emerged in each Government
Keywords:
Collective Housing; Post-Revolutionary Government; Indicators of Collective Housing; Mixed MethodAbstract
After the glorious Islamic revolution, there were unique and diverse discourses to solve existing problems and shortcomings, and each of these discourses have manifested themselves in collective housing in these periods. This research uses a combined method to achieve this How those discourses have appeared in collective housing in each government and to what extent each of them had a contribution in the field of collective housing by using nest by nest method by examining the views of collective housing designers (etic) and by interviewing and extracting indicators and the views of users. The spatial (emic) has been done with a questionnaire. This research has a qualitative and quantitative approach and for the interview and the output of the cascade software from the Atlasti software and the quantitative software used in this research is NCSS, in which factor analysis is done in the Varimax method. The results show that in the physical dimensions of the national housing variable with a value of (0.974), the highest influence is related to the assignment of land in less developed areas with a value of (0.974) and in the spatial dimension, the increase of interactive space with a value of (945.0) 0) and the lowest standard revival is necessary to minimize the construction time (0.561). In the social dimension, studies on failed collective housing (0.814) have the most impact and the standardization of collective housing (414) has the least impact. In the economic dimensions, the highest growth in liquidity and the increase in the ratio of materials (0.811) and the least support for the housing of the former (0.325), in the cultural dimension, the presence of unpleasant odors in the open space (0.223), the least and the most related to the training of the workforce Maher is (0.691). In service-climate, the use of contextual architecture (0.491) and attention to the basics of sustainability in design and implementation (0.161) are the most and the least.
References
Aghaei, S. D. (2016). The European Union and the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Sarai Adalat Publishing House.
Akhwan Kazemi, B. (2010). Looking at the twenty-year vision document and its political components. Islamic government, 38, 56-75.
Azizi, M. M. (2004). The position of housing indicators in the housing planning process. Fine arts magazine, 17.
Arjomand, S. A. (2019). After Khomeini: Iran under His Successors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ehteshami, A. (2016). After Khomein: The Iranian Second Republic. New York: Routledge.
Ehtashami, A. (2018). Iran's foreign policy during the period of construction. Tehran: Revolution Documents Center.
Grigor, T. (2013). Tehran: An Urban History of Revolution. Retrieved from: http://www.farhang.org/events/tehran-an-urban-history-of-revolutions.
Grinceri, D. (2016). Architecture as Cultural and Political Discourse: Case studies of conceptual norms and aesthetic practices. New York: Routledge.
Habibi, S. M. (2006). Description of the currents of architecture and urban planning in contemporary Iran with an emphasis on the time period of 2007-2008. Tehran: Cultural Research Office.
Hosseinzadeh, M. A. (2007). Discourses governing post-revolutionary governments in the Islamic Republic of Tehran. Center for Islamic Revolution Documents.
Isenstadt, S., & Rizvi, K. (2018). Modernism and the Middle East: Architecture and Politics in the Twenties Century. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Jalaipour, H. (2000). Hidden government, sociological investigation of the threatening factors of the reform movement (1999-2000). Tehran: New design.
Kamrava, M. (2016). Iran's Intellectual Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Leach, N. (2013). Architecture and Revolution: Contemporary Perspectives on Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Routledge.
Moslinejad, A. (2008). Analysis of political culture in contemporary Iran based on critical theory. Political studies, 5, 47-60.
Mirsalim, S. M. (2007). Cultural currentism after the Islamic revolution of Iran (2007-2008). Tehran: Center for Recognizing Islam and Iran.
Ministry of Economy and Financial Affairs. (2014). The 20-Year National Vision of the Islamic Republic of Iran for the dawn of the Solar Calendar Year 1404 [2025 C.E.].
Naji, K. (2015). Ahmadinejad: The Secret History of Iran's Radical Leader. University of California Press.
Najafi, B. (2015). Measuring the contribution of factors affecting the supply of housing in the urban areas of the country during the years 2015-2016. Housing Economics Quarterly, 37 and 38.
Paul, H. (2005). Space & Power; Politics, War and Architecture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rahmani, M. (1996). Evaluation of the housing sector in the form of economic and social development programs. Collection of articles of the third seminar on housing development policies in Iran, Tehran, University of Tehran.
Rafipour, F. (1998). Development and contradiction: an effort to analyze the Islamic revolution and Iran's social issues. Tehran: Publishing Company
Soltani, A. A. (2004). Power, discourse and language, mechanisms of power flow in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Ney Publishing.
Vezi, Y. (2008). Political and social developments after the Islamic revolution in Iran. Tehran: Arouj publishing house.
Zarifinia, H. (1999). Autopsy of political factions in Iran 1979 to 1999. Tehran: Azadi Andisheh.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
