Modeling the Effects of Enclosure Components in Ekbatan and Ati Saz Residential Complexes
Keywords:
Enclosure Dimensions; Ekbatan Residential Complex; Ati Saz Residential Complex; Combined Method.Abstract
Examining the physical-perceptual structure of architecture creates a context for users to understand the goals and meaning of architecture by being in the space, on the other hand, it creates the precise proportions of the spatial body, in which meanings can be understood. Movement in space, both internal and external, which is created by the presence of the body, deepens the users' understanding of architecture. Functional body structure also refers to the activities that take place inside the space and means a proportional body that creates a suitable space for certain activities. This research is of a nested combination of qualitative and quantitative to extract components and dimensions after a semi-structured interview and then from PN modeling for the degree of factor effect and comparing the component effect system as well as the matrix. Correlation sampling is used for the snowball system interview, and in the quantitative stage, the upper limit of the Morgan table is used. The facilitating software’s are ATLASTI8 and JMPSAS17. The results show that access coherence, user coherence and environmental coherence have the highest dimension and a larger factor contribution that has significant relationships, but coherence in creating security despite the influence coefficient of Bal has a significant relationship. does not have Coherence in municipal laws has a larger factor share than the first three cases, but it has a less significant amount. In general, based on the scope of the effect of the components of confinement and also its focus, it shows the continuity of the relationship between the components. Based on the relational correlation, it is determined that each dimension has a relationship with the other two dimensions and can be predicted, and the third dimension, which will be added to the blue color, has far less predictability than them. It is important to pay attention to the dimension of cohesion in both sets, which has no predictability based on other dimensions and has acted separately and should be considered in the first stage for planning and design. In general, the dimensions of confinement in the collection of Ati Saz and Ekbatan have a correlation of 0.772 in the way of application.
References
Einifar, A., & Ghazizadeh, N. (2010). Typology of residential complexes in Tehran with open space criteria. Armanshahr Journal, 3(5), 35-46.
Alikaei, S., & Zamani, S. (2014). The principles of coherent urban design with an emphasis on the spatial qualities of the city. Third International Congress on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Development, 1-14.
Berkman, L. F., Kawachi, I., & Glymour, M. M. (Eds.). (2014). Social Epidemiology. Oxford University Press.
Bruhn, J. G. (2011). The sociology of community connections. Springer Science & Business Media.
Caldeira, T. P. (2000). City of walls: crime, segregation, and citizenship in São Paulo. University of California Press.
Cséfalvay, Z. (2011). Gated communities for security or prestige? A public choice approach and the case of Budapest. International journal of urban and regional research, 35(4), 735-752.
Falahat, M. P., & Shahidi, P. (2015). The Role of the Concept of Mass-Space in Explaining the Place of Architecture. Bagh-e Nazar Scientific Research Monthly, 12(35), 27-38.
Hamouche, M. B. (2009). Can chaos theory explain complexity in urban fabric? Applications in traditional Muslim settlements. Nexus network journal: Architecture, Mathematics and Structure, 217-242.
Hatami, R., & Ziyai Naji, P. (2017). Explaining the concepts of enclosure in architectural space. The 5th International Conference on Architecture and Sustainable Urbanism in the Middle East and South Asia, 10-10.
Hatami, R., & Ziyai Naji, P. (2021). Investigating the relationship between the energy consumed in activities and the spatial confinement component in order to improve the quality of the architectural design process. Armanshahr Architecture and Urbanism, 14(34), 79-89.
Ismaili, T., Kayani, H., & Janbaz Ghobadi, Gh. (2013). Sustainable development planning of coastal areas using spatial coherence approach, case study of Noor and Mahmoud Abad cities. Second International Congress on Structure, Architecture and Urban Development, 11-11.
Judd, D. (1995). The rise of the new walled cities. Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affair, Cleveland State University.
Le Goix, R., & Webster, C. J. (2008). Gated communities. Geography Compass, 2(4), 1189-1214.
Levinson, D., & Christensen, K. (2003). Encyclopedia of community: from the village to the virtual world (Vol. 1). Sage Publication.
Low, S. (2004). Behind the gates: Life, security, and the pursuit of happiness in fortress America. Routledge.
McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia: Homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. Yale University Press.
Murillo, R., Echeverria, S., & Vasquez, E. (2016). Differences in neighborhood social cohesion and aerobic physical activity by Latino subgroup. SSM - Population Health, 2, 536-541.
Mohammadi Zadeh, N., Majdi, H., Zarabadi, Z. S. (2017). Presenting a conceptual model of cohesion and fusion criteria in the context of historical neighborhoods with each other (case example: Kerman historical context neighborhoods, region 1). Bagh Nazar, 15(61), 36-52.
Negin Taji, P. (2011). Investigating the Role of Physical Factors in Forming the Concept of Place and Sense of Place. Landscape Journal, 3, 29-16.
Pourjafar, M., & Sadeghi, A. (2008). The principles of rulings on the purposeful design of urban landmarks. Urban Identity, 2(3), 95-106.
Qin, W., Wang, Y., & Cho, S. (2021). Neighborhood Social Cohesion, Physical Disorder, and Daily Activity Limitations Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 93, 104295.
Roshni, P., Habibi, K., Zarabadi, Z. S. (2016). Presenting a conceptual model for the integration of the urban space network and its application in the 6th district of Tehran. Bagh Nazar, 14(48), 31-42.
Salah, N. M., & Ayad, H. (2018). Why people choose gated communities: A case study of Alexandria metropolitan area. Alexandria engineering journal, 57(4), 2743-2753.
Sassen, S. (2018). Cities in a world economy. Sage Publications.
Seydian, S. A., & Abafat Yeganeh, M. (2007). Review of the Concept of Physical Confinement in Urban Space. Rah-o-Sakhtman Monthly, 46, 46-54.
Shulin, S. H. I., Zhonghua, G. O. U., & Leslie, H. C. (2014). How does enclosure influence environmental preferences? A cognitive study on urban public open spaces in Hong Kong. Sustainable Cities and Society, 13, 148-156.
Tolai, N. (2002). The form of a coherent city. Safa, 12(3), 5-19.
Vesselinov, E., & Le Goix, R. (2012). From picket fences to iron gates: suburbanization and gated communities in Phoenix, Las Vegas and Seattle. Geo Journal, 77(2), 203-222.
Wang, R., Lu, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, P., Yao, Y., & Liu, Y. (2019). The relationship between visual enclosure for neighbourhood street walkability and elders’ mental health in China: Using Street view images. Journal of Transport & Health, 13, 90-102.
Yilmaz, N. G., Lee, P. J., Imran, M., & Jeong, J. H. (2023). Role of sounds in perception of enclosure in urban street canyons. Sustainable Cities and Society, 90, 104394.
Yip, C., Sarma, S., & Wilk, P. (2016). The association between social cohesion and physical activity in Canada: A multilevel analysis. SSM - Population Health, 2, 718-723.
Zakavat, K. (2011). The position of spatial organization in urban design. Safa, 54, 105-118.
Zargarzadeh Dezfouli, M., Babaei Murad, B., & Babai Murad, M. (2013). The lostness of the spatial function of Iranian neighborhoods in the integration of today's urban structure, a case example of Kebabian Shahr neighborhood (Hamadan). The second national conference on architecture and urban planning over time, 11-11.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
