Comparison of Construction Discourse and Justice in Relation to Collective Housing
Keywords:
Construction Discourse; Justice-Oriented Discourse; Collective Housing; Hybrid MethodAbstract
Collective housing is an emerging phenomenon in the contemporary world that has been able to provide a wide range of societal demands and accommodate a wide range of social groups. Following the Islamic Revolution, contemporary Iranian architecture has arisen in the framework of the republic's political discourse. The government's position on the development of mass and social housing is based on the Islamic Revolution's major priority from an economic standpoint. This study was created with the goal of separating the building and justice discourses and assessing the factor contribution of each discourse on the dimensions of community housing. The research approach is a nested blend of qualitative and exploratory quantitative research that first defines the sorts of discourses before observing the communal housing complexes in each time and their repercussions (disadvantages, benefits). Then, based on the observations of the discourses, 384 space users are given a questionnaire with a Likert scale to evaluate the efficacy of the outcomes. In Enviews software, the findings are examined using inferential statistics. The findings show that constructive discourse has the most impact on outcomes; the elimination of some domestic activities has left the standardization and disregard for ecology with a value of (1,000) with least impact on rent provided ownership with a value of (0.258), but has the greatest impact in the justice-oriented period. The discourse of beauty and integrity, with a value of (1,000) has the most influence and the least impact on the discourse of marginalized people, a significant fall in construction quality, acceleration of building, and underutilized areas (0.116).
References
Abdullahzadeh Isa Kand, K. (2015). Designing a favorable residential complex for low-income groups (social housing). Master Thesis in Architecture, Islamic Art University, Tabriz.
Aghaei, P. (2017). Evaluation of Urban Housing Policies in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Public Policy Studies Network
Drudgar, A. (2016). Transformation of the Discourse of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Architecture of Government Buildings (1989-2013). Doctorate thesis in Art Research, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran.
Esfandiari Sadegh, R., Karimi Moshaver, M., & Daneshgar Moghadam, G. (2016). Assessment of collective feeling in residential complexes. Shahrov Identity, 27, 41-53.
Farshchi, H., & Torki Baghbadrani, H. (2018). Study of the process of participation of users (people) in the process of housing design with a collective architecture approach. Research in Arts and Humanities, 3(11 consecutive) (2), 33-44.
Guy, S. (2002). Development and Developers: Perspectives on Property. University of New Castle: Blackwell Publishing.
Horelli, L. (2002). A Methodology of Participatory Planning. In R. B. Bechtel and A. Churman (Eds), Handbook of Environmental Psychology, 607-623. Wiley.
Ismaili Darkeh, V., & Ziari, Y. A. (2016). Study and comparison of housing policies in Iran and Sweden. International Conference on Science and Engineering in the Age of Technology, Vienna.
Javadi, A. (2017). Study and evaluation of environmental quality in two types of social housing [seal and rent] (Case study: the new city of Baharestan). Master Thesis in Urban Planning, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran.
Jourabchi, K. (2009). Environmental approach to collective urban housing with medium density and height. Doctoral dissertation, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran
Mousavi, G., Jafari Nejad, M., & Azin, A. (2019). Analysis of Economic Development Discourse from the Perspective of Sub-Discourses of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iranian Social Science Studies, 62, 64-147.
Moustafa, Y. M. (2004). Environmental Design and the Local Community. A Theoretical Framework Tested Through Two Case Studies in Cairo, Egypt. The University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee.
Napolia, G., & Trovatob, M. (2016). Affordability and Income – Threshold in Social Housing Policy. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 181-186.
Petkovic, G., Branislava, N., Stoiljkovic, G., Jovanovic, P., Mitkovic, P., & Kekovic, A. (2017). The Spatial Comfort of Housing Units in the Post – S0cinlist Periodin Serbia in Relation to the Applicable Architectureal Norm. Cities, 62, 88-95.
Rezaei Panah, A. (2010). Social and Economic Foundations of Transformation in Dominant Political Discourses in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Master Thesis in Political Science, University of Tabriz.
Shahbazi, M., Yeganeh, M., & Bamanian, M. (2020). Meta-analysis of environmental vitality factors in open spaces. Motaleate Shahri, 9(34), 61-76. doi: 10.34785/J011.2021.812
Shahrokhifar, Z. (2016). Comparative Analysis of Housing Executive Policies in Development Plans after the Islamic Revolution (Kermanshah). Master Thesis in Geography and Urban Planning - Housing Planning, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran.
Soltani, Z., & Warsh, H. R. (2017). An Analysis of Residents' Satisfaction with Rental Social Housing on the Condition of Acquisition (Case Study: Shiraz Metropolis). Spatial Planning (Geography), 3 (26 consecutive), 107-128.
Thompson, C. (2017). I Don’t Know How I'm still standing a Bakhtinian Analysis of Social Housing and Health Harratives in East London. Social Science & Medicine, 177, 27-34.
Vojdani Irani, O. (2016). Evaluation of government policies in providing social housing in cities around the metropolis of Tehran (Case study: Shahriar city). Master Thesis in Geography and Urban Planning, Payame Noor University, Shahreri.
Wentling, J. (2013). Lifestyle design based on lifestyle (Habib Ghasemi, K. Trans.). Tehran.
Zafari, S. (2018). Design of Small Social Housing Buildings (Case Study: Mehr Tonekabon Housing. Master Thesis in Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Ramsar Branch.
Ziari, K., Mahdi Nejad, H., Parhiz, F., & Aghajani, M. (2011). Study of housing status of income groups and estimation of housing of low-income groups (case study: Hormozgan province). Geographical Research, 3, 56-29.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
