Aesthetic and Symbolic Analysis of the Manuscript Illustration Alexander the Great (Sikandar) in Conversation with WakWak Tree (Talking Tree) in Shahnameh Demot
Main Article Content
Abstract
Combining Persian miniature and literature together has been influential in the recent decades. Illustrated Shahnameh Demot (Book of Kings, Great Persian Epic), which is known as the most valuable illustrated artwork in the first Tabrīz school, is considered to be the special style of Persian Illustration or Miniature during Mughal Ilkhanid era, taking advantage of interaction between literature and painting. This article attempts to examine artistic and visual qualities of the illustration “Alexander the Great (Sikandar) in conversation with WakWak tree” in Ilkhanid era. A descriptive-analytic approach is used to investigate the interaction between literature and illustration. The research results indicated that the tree is a concept existing beyond human mind, and that it is embodied through symbolism. In Shahnameh, WakWak tree or Talking tree is a symbolic tree where Alexander is in conversation with WakWak tree and the tree foresees his future. As the art is always influenced by the ideology underscoring the era, it could be alleged that mythological thought has been influential in the artistic structure of illustration, and it has been turned into an aesthetic language that has led to the reflection of the evolution of poetry in the illustration. In this illustration, by the adept composition of the debates raised, Ilkhanid illustrator subtly abducts the image from the heart of poetry, and intertwines his capabilities and potentials with words of poetry, such that visual symbolism and color, in keeping with the themes of Shahnameh, are some of the most important features embodied in the elements underlying the illustration.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright owner / Copyright holder:
Authors retain unrestricted copyrights and publishing rights. The author has complete control over the work (e.g., retains the right to reuse, distribute, republish, etc.).
Copyright Notice:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows others to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See: The Effect of Open Access).
References
Azhand, Y. (2009). The reality Wak in Iranian painting. Visual arts, Fine arts publication, (38).
Anonymous. (1967). Bhagavad gita. (A. Mehrin, Trans.). Tehran, Atai Press Institute, Ch (2), 248.
Dariush. (2013). Tree and its symbolism in Shahnameh. Atash Veratam Weblog, Rouzbahan, 1.
Dehkhoda, A. (1995). Dictionary of Dehkhoda. Tehran University.
Donis, A. Dondis. (2006). A primer of Visual Literacy. (Sepehr, Trans.). Tehran, Soroush Press, 45-47.
Fazeli, F., Nikouei, A., & Naghdi, E. (2013). Cross-cultural approach to plants and trees in mythology and literature. Literature and Languages, Literature Studies, (23).
Jahez. Al-Haivan. 9th Century AD/3rd AH.
Jannati, A. (2015). Illusionism talking tree with a focus on the designs of Persian carpets. Kashan University of Art and Architecture.
Khalaf Tabrizi, B. (1684). Borhan Ghate’e. Tehran, Mohammad Abbasi Publications, Kolaleh Khavar.
Museum and Document Center of Iran Parliament.
Pakbaz, R. (2001). Persian painting from ancient times until today. Zarrin and Simin Publications, 62.
Parham, S. (2008). A review of Persian art from prehistoric times until today. Supervised by Arthur Pope and Phyllis Ackerman, Ch.48, Tehran, 2103.
Pishabouri, A. (982). Hudud Al-Alam. (Minorski, Trans.).
Rabii, S. (2012). A Review of Wak’s Decorative Motifs in Islamic Art.
Taheri, A. (2012). Sacred tree, WakWak Tree, and formation trend of the motif of Wak. Journal of Bagh-e-Nazar, (19), 43-54.
Taheri, A. Rabie, S. (2011). Indeed decorative Wak motif of Islamic art. Universiry of Sistan and Baluchestan, 55.
Takhti, M. (2012). Image and concepts of WakWak Tree in Persian handmade rugs. Golcham, Scientific-Research Journal of Association of Persian Rugs. 18.